[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [Plus haut] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Table des matières] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Our simple sample function, (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
, specifies
three argument variables, so it must be called with three arguments: if you
try to call it with only two arguments or four arguments, you get a
wrong-number-of-arguments
error.
It is often convenient to write a function that allows certain arguments to
be omitted. For example, the function substring
accepts three
arguments—a string, the start index and the end index—but the third
argument defaults to the length of the string if you omit it. It is
also convenient for certain functions to accept an indefinite number of
arguments, as the functions list
and +
do.
To specify optional arguments that may be omitted when a function is called,
simply include the keyword &optional
before the optional arguments.
To specify a list of zero or more extra arguments, include the keyword
&rest
before one final argument.
Thus, the complete syntax for an argument list is as follows:
(required-vars… [&optional optional-vars…] [&rest rest-var]) |
The square brackets indicate that the &optional
and &rest
clauses, and the variables that follow them, are optional.
A call to the function requires one actual argument for each of the
required-vars. There may be actual arguments for zero or more of the
optional-vars, and there cannot be any actual arguments beyond that
unless the lambda list uses &rest
. In that case, there may be any
number of extra actual arguments.
If actual arguments for the optional and rest variables are omitted, then
they always default to nil
. There is no way for the function to
distinguish between an explicit argument of nil
and an omitted
argument. However, the body of the function is free to consider nil
an abbreviation for some other meaningful value. This is what
substring
does; nil
as the third argument to substring
means to use the length of the string supplied.
Common Lisp note: Common Lisp allows the function to specify what default value to use when an optional argument is omitted; Emacs Lisp always uses
nil
. Emacs Lisp does not support “supplied-p” variables that tell you whether an argument was explicitly passed.
For example, an argument list that looks like this:
(a b &optional c d &rest e) |
binds a
and b
to the first two actual arguments, which are
required. If one or two more arguments are provided, c
and d
are bound to them respectively; any arguments after the first four are
collected into a list and e
is bound to that list. If there are only
two arguments, c
is nil
; if two or three arguments, d
is nil
; if four arguments or fewer, e
is nil
.
There is no way to have required arguments following optional ones—it
would not make sense. To see why this must be so, suppose that c
in
the example were optional and d
were required. Suppose three actual
arguments are given; which variable would the third argument be for? Would
it be used for the c, or for d? One can argue for both
possibilities. Similarly, it makes no sense to have any more arguments
(either required or optional) after a &rest
argument.
Here are some examples of argument lists and proper calls:
((lambda (n) (1+ n)) ; One required: 1) ; requires exactly one argument. ⇒ 2 ((lambda (n &optional n1) ; One required and one optional: (if n1 (+ n n1) (1+ n))) ; 1 or 2 arguments. 1 2) ⇒ 3 ((lambda (n &rest ns) ; One required and one rest: (+ n (apply '+ ns))) ; 1 or more arguments. 1 2 3 4 5) ⇒ 15 |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [Plus haut] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Table des matières] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Ce document a été généré par Eric Reinbold le 13 Octobre 2007 en utilisant texi2html 1.78.